When we resist God’s reminders

When we resist God’s reminders

When we resist God’s reminders
George Hutcheson (1615-1674) ministered in Ayrshire and Edinburgh and was a noted bible expositor. Like many other ministers he was removed from his congregation in 1662 for refusing to conform to the rule of bishops.

From the Bible we know that whatever events occur in our experience, good or bad, routine or startling, they are all reminders from God to come closer to Him and turn our backs more comprehensively on sin. This principle holds good not only for individuals but also larger communities including nations. Our nation has had a summer of bad weather, with drought in some places meaning a poor harvest, while many domestic and international problems persist whatever efforts are made to tackle them. Our helplessness to do anything about the weather should make us depend more heavily on God, and our inability to solve our own problems should make us apply to Him for wisdom. However, when God sends difficulties and our attempts to improve our situation keep being frustrated, although it should prompt us to repent and turn to God all over again, we often respond in the opposite way. We instead persist in our sinful ways and ignore God’s interest and involvement in our situation. This is not because it is difficult to discern what God wants — just repentance — but because we prefer our sinning to His holiness. As George Hutcheson points out in the following updated extract, until grace intervenes, we commit ourselves to a vicious cycle of a thrawn, obstinate response leading to more trouble and misery, leading to more obstinacy. For ourselves and others, both as individuals and as members of society, we can only appeal to the God of grace to change our hearts so that, on experiencing yet another problem, we take it as an invitation to return to Him to restore us and bless us.

God’s challenge

By the prophet Amos the Lord makes three accusations as against His people. Firstly, they are committing cruel and covetous oppression (Amos 4:1); secondly, they are idolatrous (v.4–5); and here, thirdly, they show incorrigibleness and impenitency (vv.6–11).

For their idolatry and other sins, God had inflicted many judgements to reclaim them, yet they did not return to Him, but persisted obstinately in their wicked courses.

The judgments and corrections which they had thus abused are listed in Amos 4:6–11. And yet to all these, and every one of them, is subjoined the fact that they made no right use of any one of them.

What can we learn from this whole challenge in general?

Persistence in sin is itself sin

When God begins to reckon with a church, He finds her guilty not of one, or a few, but many gross faults. In this process, beside the faults He has already accused her of, He also finds her guilty of being incorrigible.

Believers cannot thrive in sin

A pathway of sin will not turn out to be a way for anyone to thrive in, but this is especially true of the church. The Lord will make His church either a theatre of mercy or a field of blood, and He has many rods to achieve this.

The Lord wants His people to come back

The Lord strikes His church sorest, and with most rods, either together or one after another. Yet in doing so He only calls her to repentance, and drives her to His mercy. His accusation is that, when they were under all these judgements, yet they did not set about turning to Him — the very thing He was aiming at.

Self-affirmed penitence isn’t enough

It must not be people’s own conceits, or their biased self-love, which pass the verdict on the truth and reality of their repentance, but God Himself. Whatever they might claim to offer Him under afflictions, yet He Himself takes charge of discerning its validity.

It isn’t easy to return by way of judgments

Whatever exercise judgements may put sinners to, yet it is not easy to attain to true repentance under them. This is the constant challenge, “Yet ye have not returned to me.” This is not to limit the Lord; of course He both can and does drive people to Him by rods inflicted for sin; yet it is no small difficulty (as sad experience proves) in too many. How so?

Even sad strokes are not soon felt by everyone, or felt in such a way as to stir them up to any spiritual exercise.

When strokes are felt, people quickly and easily feel bitterness, resentment, discouragement, etc. But repentance is a more difficult task, and is often impeded by these distempered reactions.

God’s hand in rods is not soon or easily seen to invite us to repentance as the only remedy, or we see only a little of it because we are too busy looking at instruments and second causes.

When we do in general acknowledge that God is in some way involved in our calamities, yet we may deceive ourselves with a deluded conceit of being delivered in some other way, or by some means other than by turning to Him.

Even when we are convicted of the necessity of repentance, yet it is not easy to attain sincerity and steadfastness in it.

Even when we desire most sincerely to repent under calamities, yet we cannot succeed till first we look back, and mourn for our slighting of the Word which drew down the rod.

In short, no providence can produce repentance, without the grace of God. Instead, troubles of themselves will drive people further from repentance.

Our incorrigibleness

It indicates very sad wrath on God’s part, and much impenitence on our part, when not only the same judgements continue, but new judgements are inflicted, one after another. The variety of rods declared that Israel had not yet returned to God, and that He was still pursuing them. None of the rods formerly inflicted had any effect, but God was still angry, and they were still walking contrary to God. This provokes Him to walk contrary to us, and punish us yet more.

Those who do not repent after one rod are liable to misuse (and harden themselves under) many. Judgements are in themselves stupefying, and only harden sinners, unless grace prevents it. Misuse of one rod draws on more hardness, and makes a sinner fit for misusing more rods.

Famine

Famine is a rod which could have brought them back to God’s ways — “I have given you cleanness of teeth (famine, no food to foul their teeth) and lack of bread” (v.6). Sinners may think little of their daily bread, but famine is a sad stroke.

When people will not be led even by the principles of reason to acknowledge God, or accept their duty, or to take notice of any evidences of God’s displeasure against them, it shows they have become like the brute creatures. Then it is only just that God treats them like animals, pinching them in their belly, as a stroke which they would feel.

Sin is for the most part so deeply rooted in people’s hearts, and they take so little notice of God in calamities, that it is no wonder to see people starved out of the world before they will famish their idols, and relinquish sin.

It is righteous with God to let people smart from want when they have abused prosperity. These people abused their plenty to serve their lusts and make themselves drunk (v. 1). They left God’s temple and priests without sacrifices and maintenance, instead spending what they had on their idols, and on maintaining unlawful priests (vv. 4–5).

It adds to the affliction, that it was “in all your cities,” and “in all your places” (v.6). It is a sad lot, and indicates much displeasure from the Lord, when He makes strokes universal, so that no one can help anyone else.

Drought

The longer sinners are warned of judgements before they are inflicted, the more it heightens their impenitence before the Lord. It adds to the people’s sin that they had three months’ drought before the harvest came (the time when rain was most needed) to warn them of the ensuing famine, and yet it had no effect. “Ye have not returned to me” (vv.7–8).

As God’s providence is supreme in ordering all natural causes and effects, even in dispensing rain, so it aggravates the impenitence of sinners when God’s hand is eminently seen, and yet they do not seek Him.

The Lord, when He pleases, can make as small a matter as a drink of water prove a great trial to a people. “Two or three cities wandered to one city (likely where it had rained) to drink water” (v.8). It cannot but add to a people’s sin, when they are made to feel a stroke, and it gives them toil, and yet they don’t use it to recognise God’s point of view, or turn to Him.

Notwithstanding their wandering from city to city, “they were not satisfied” (v.8). Whatever sinners do to get rid of troubles, yet when they neglect repentance, it is fitting and just that they will be disappointed in their efforts.

It is our great sin that when we are disappointed in all our expectations, and thwarted in all our efforts to get rid of troubles, yet we will not, among our other attempts, try to turn to God. “Yet have ye not returned to me, saith the Lord” (v.8).

Blight and locusts

God can arm all His creatures to cut off provision, one after another. Beside the drought, He sends blight and mildew to cut off their corn, and the palmerworm (locust) to spoil their gardens, vineyards and other fruit-trees (v.9).

Under affliction, people look mainly at the present particular means of their trouble; yet even if that is removed, it will not avail them so long as God is angry. Rather, whatever change there may be in providence, the impenitent may expect to meet with trouble. The blight came by withering winds, but when that was removed, and they got rain, it was no use to them — cold rain followed by the heat of the sun bred mildew.

It is a great aggravation of impenitency, when the Lord makes all kinds of creatures prove enemies, and yet people will not be driven to make God their friend. “Yet have ye not returned unto me, saith the Lord” (v.9)

Plague and violence

When famine did not prevail, God had pestilence and the sword to use against them. It is very sad and humbling that the Lord, who previously appeared gloriously for His people by plaguing their enemies, is now provoked to make His own people feel the same plagues. “I have sent among you the pestilence after the manner of Egypt” (v.10a). And it is even sadder when this does not drive them to God.

Where God has a controversy, the endeavours of a nation against their enemies will have little effect, and will only contribute to heaping miseries on themselves. They ought to see God’s hand in this. “Your young men have I slain with the sword, and have taken away your horses, and I have made the stink of your camp to come up into your nostrils” (v.10b).

Yet they would not be induced to turn to God! He not only made the endeavours of enemies successful, but smote them with pestilence. Their low condition, with a broken military force, and their camp stinking, was a warning to them, “yet have ye not returned unto me, saith the Lord” (v.10).

Overthrow

The visible church may transgress so far as to deserve to be afflicted as severely as the worst of people, and God may in justice inflict what she deserves. “I have overthrown some of you, as God overthrew Sodom and Gomorrah” (v.11).

Nevertheless, the Lord is still gracious to His church and people. He preserves a remnant of them in the midst of utter desolation, and notwithstanding great provocations. He may still see it fit that those who are preserved will bear the marks of these calamities, so that they will be stirred up to make good use of what they have experienced. He says to the remnant preserved, “Ye were as a firebrand plucked out of the burning” (v.11), pointing out both His goodness in plucking them out, and the prints of the fire that were left on them.

It is an undeniable proof of a people’s incorrigibleness, when neither the extremity of judgements, nor the extremity of God’s displeasure, nor His immediate hand in them; nor the fact that in wrath He has remembered mercy, will prevail with them to make them turn to God. “Yet have ye not returned unto me, saith the Lord” (v.11).

 

FURTHER READING

Read more articles from the George Hutcheson blog

AUTHOR MENU

READ MORE

LIKE THIS

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter and receive an updated article every week.

Recovering from bad shepherds

Recovering from bad shepherds

Recovering from bad shepherds
George Hutcheson (1615-1674) ministered in Ayrshire and Edinburgh and was a noted bible expositor. Like many other ministers he was removed from his congregation in 1662 for refusing to conform to the rule of bishops.

Few things are as devastating in the experience of a congregation as a trusted pastor or minister turning out to be guilty of sins which completely disqualify them from the office and invite the contempt of even the world. That one cheated on his wife, that one hit his wife, that one turned to drink, that one interfered with children, that one took advantage of a disabled member of the congregation, that one got involved with young men, that one became addicted to gambling, and all of it was while they continued preaching, soaked up other people’s respect, and made out to everyone that they were godly, faithful ministers. Reeling and bruised congregations wonder what their minister’s reputed doctrinal purity is worth now, or his conservative approach to various topical issues, or his vocal commitment to denominational distinctives. None of these things ever provide any guarantee against catastrophic moral failure, or any comfort in the wake of the exposure of shameful wrongdoing. We realise, too late perhaps, that we were distracted by something secondary, such as gifts or personality, and overlooked the primary qualification of character. But Jesus remains the one shepherd and bishop of our souls. When under-shepherds turn out to be wolves, Jesus remains the good shepherd. In a discussion of Jesus’ teaching on the good shepherd, George Hutcheson points out the various contrasts between Christ and the “thief” and the “hireling” in John 10:10–12. Looking at Jesus allows us to take comfort and remain settled in the gospel in spite of the betrayals of hirelings. It also equips to be better able to identify and exclude from pastoral office those whose character does not match His. Hutcheson explains in the following updated extract.

The good shepherd’s work is gifting, not robbing

Christ declares in John 10:10 that He is the true shepherd, firstly in opposition to those whom He call “thieves and robbers.” Either they make out themselves to be the Messiah, or they run unsent and bring in false doctrine. These he declares to be enemies and not shepherds, who come only to harm the flock. By contrast, His errand is to give them life, and that in great abundance.

False teachers and seducers make so many attractive claims, and plausible appearances, that the evil of their way is not soon seen. That is why we must make sure to inculcate what it is that the thief comes to do.

Whatever attractive claims these seducers make, and however much people are taken with them, yet in reality they have come for the hurt of the flock. This is how it will turn out, and be seen, in the end. “The thief comes not, but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy” — that is the whole aim of their work. And this meets with the blind charity of at least some in the flock, who are not so much afraid of being hurt by their errors as they are expecting to get good by their displays of piety.

These false teachers are really nothing but “thieves,” both from the point of view that they only make a prey of souls, taking them away from Christ, stealing away their food in order to give them poison, betraying Christ of His glory, and tricking them out of their happiness; and also from the fact that they do all this in a clandestine and indirect way.

However happy the deluded souls may think themselves, when they have been made a prey to seducers, and deluded with their insinuations, yet all this leads only to their destruction, and to their eternal ruin, if mercy does not prevent it. These thieves are “robbers,” (v. 8), who come to kill and to destroy, as much as to steal.

But Christ is a shepherd who is be so far from destroying His flock that He gives them life, even to those of them who are dead. “I am come that they might have life.”

Christ’s great goal in coming to the world is to purchase and confer life on His own elect. Whatever way He deals with them, yet it is all directed towards giving them life. When they think it is otherwise, that is their own mistake. For Christ not only intends life, but “more abundant life” to His flock.

What does “life more abundant” mean?

  • Although He gave life to His people before His incarnation, yet He lets it out more abundantly since, to show the difference between the light of the now risen sun of righteousness, and the light that His people had from Him before.
  • He gives not only the kind of life that will simply supply the basic needs of His people, but such a super-abounding measure of life as testifies to His fullness, and completely refreshes them.
  • Having conferred this abundant life on them in conversion, He will make it grow more and more while they are on earth (1 Thess. 4:1).
  • All this life that they enjoy here is but a drop, in comparison of that abundance of life that is reserved for His people in glory.

The good shepherd serves the sheep, not himself

Christ also declares Himself to be the true shepherd in opposition to “hirelings.” These “hired hands” have a lawful calling, and do not come to kill the sheep with false doctrine, but do preach truth; yet they are unfaithful in the carrying out their responsibilities. In verse 11 Christ declares what He is in opposition to these: “I am the good shepherd, who lays down his life for his sheep.”

How to identify a good shepherd

These properties of a shepherd, strictly speaking, belong properly and only to Christ. By these characteristics He is distinguished not only from hirelings or seducers, but also from the true ministers who are sent out in His name. But we must also consider that He approves of lawful under-shepherds under Himself, and contrasts Himself here only to hirelings. So, beside the consideration of what is unique to Him, or requires a unique consideration in Him, we may look to these properties as they are taken in a broader sense. In this broader sense, some of these properties do belong also to His faithful servants, in their measure and proportion, and by them they are distinguished from hirelings and false teachers.

One important doctrine to grasp here is that whatever hirelings or seducers infest the church, yet the elect do not lack a shepherd. Christ does employ servants under Him, yet He does not hand over His responsibility for His people, but remains still the “chief shepherd and overseer” to them, to care for them, and supply them with food by His own appointed means. In both these respects, “I am the shepherd,” He says (see 1 Peter 5:4).

Christ eminently deserves the title of a “good shepherd.” He is infinite in knowledge, to discern all the necessities of His flock. He is infinite in pity and wisdom, to deal tenderly with them (see Isaiah 40:11).

Good and faithful shepherds put the good of their flock ahead of even their own life. And as Christ not only gives life to his sheep, but His own life for them, so His faithful servants should not “account their life dear,” but worth nothing unless they fulfil their ministry, and bear testimony to the truth (Acts 20:24). Christ propounds it in general terms that the character of a true shepherd is that he “giveth his life for the sheep,” to indicate that though this was eminently and uniquely true of Him, as the Saviour of His people, yet His servants must be resolved to lay down their lives, not to expiate sin, but in the service of the church’s faith.

How to identify a hireling

By contrast, Christ identifies what hirelings are. Thinking only of their own gain, and having no interest in nor affection to the sheep, as soon as they catch sight of any danger, whether from seducers or persecutors, they desert their stations and expose the flock to danger (v. 12). From the fact that they flee in this way, Christ concludes that they are “hirelings, and care not for the flock” (v. 13).

It is not enough that someone has an external lawful calling to the ministry, and that they are don’t preach error, unless also they are faithful and single-minded in carrying out their responsibilities. Hirelings, just as much as thieves and robbers, are named by Christ as opposite to the shepherd. They must make the chief goal of their calling to honour God and seek the good of souls.

The sheep are all Christ’s own, by reason of His purchase of them, and lordship over them. Consequently, every true pastor will count Christ’s sheep dear to him, as precious as if they were his own, simply because they are Christ’s. Those who do not respect them in this way prove themselves to be nothing but hirelings. “He careth not for the sheep” (v. 13).

They also show themselves to be hirelings when, in a time of trial, they look more to their own situation, then to the welfare of the flock, and when, to avoid trouble, they desert the flock. The hireling “seeth the wolf coming, and leaveth the sheep, and fleeth.” Some may have more light than others, and foresee trials better than others, and yet lack the courage to stay at their post. Those who lack integrity follow Christ and duty only as long as they think it compatible with their own ends.

Wolves in the church catch some of the sheep by error, some by persecution, some by scattering and dividing them and depriving them of mutual fellowship and participation in the gatherings of the church. Although this is all the wolf’s fault, yet it is also put on the hireling’s account, because he opens a gap for the wolf to get in, and exposes the sheep as a prey, and weakens them, by his example in shirking trouble, his withholding from them the encouragement of the truth, and his lack of courage in maintaining the truth.

Anyone who puts their own commodity and convenience ahead of the welfare of the flock, and deserts their duty when the flock is in danger, only prove themselves to be mercenaries and hirelings.

READ MORE

LIKE THIS

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter and receive an updated article every week.

Where to turn when things keep getting worse

Where to turn when things keep getting worse

Where to turn when things keep getting worse
George Hutcheson (1615-1674) ministered in Ayrshire and Edinburgh and was a noted bible expositor. Like many other ministers he was removed from his congregation in 1662 for refusing to conform to the rule of bishops.

We comfort ourselves sometimes with the thought that things can’t get much worse. The problem is that things often do get worse. Decision-makers in society continue to make worse decisions and don’t seem to learn from their own or other people’s mistakes. The UK’s recent dramatic relaxation of the law to protect the unborn and their mothers in England and Wales is an example of something that is flagrantly morally wrong and self-evidently harmful, yet presented with fanatical assurance as something compassionate and helpful. In George Hutcheson’s view, once people get in the habit of rejecting God’s way, it sets them on such a self-destructive path that they often don’t even notice the signs that things are going badly. Nothing can get through to them that they need to change course. George Hutcheson was reflecting on the terrible distress that the prophet Habakkuk experienced as he witnessed the societal breakdown in his own times. Habakkuk cried out in desperation to God to please make the injustice and violence stop. Whereas we would normally expect a happy ending in which God answers His servant’s prayer, God’s shocking response to Habakkuk was that things were going to get very much worse, simply as the righteous consequence of the people’s wilful rebellion and flagrant sinning. As the following updated extract shows, instead of comforting ourselves with how “things” usually work out for the best, we need to lift our eyes and our hearts to the covenant-keeping God, whose holiness and power is infinite. His faithfulness is such that we can appeal to His mercy merely as such, without needing to point to any positive developments or encouraging signs. We can rely on his faithfulness and his justice as we increase our efforts to share the gospel and a godly way of life.

His cry

In the first chapter of his prophecy, Habakkuk begins by expostulating with God, speaking in his own name and the name of the godly. “O Lord, how long shall I cry, and thou wilt not hear! Even cry out unto thee of violence, and thou wilt not save!” (Hab. 1:2) With the generality of the people being so desperately wicked, why does the Lord in His patience still bear with them, and take no course to vindicate His own glory, or abate this deluge of sin one way or other?

Habakkuk brings in various considerations. For one thing, he has worked so hard with these people, but to no purpose. Instead, with their injustice swelling up and breaking out in open violence, he had been forced for a long time to cry to God against them. Yet his prayer was not regarded, neither were the oppressed saved from violence, and Habakkuk finds this so strange.

We are not to understand this as if Habakkuk were quarrelling with God, nor as if he didn’t care about this people (later on in his prophecy he evidences great tender-heartedness toward them). Instead, the problem is that he has worked among them for so long, and pleaded with God for so long for some success to his ministry, yet he finds that iniquity still abounds, to the dishonour of God, and oppression of the godly. Not so much out of any hatred against them, but rather out of zeal to God’s honour, hatred of sin, and pity toward the oppressed, Habakkuk complains that there was no redress of this, and that God was not stopping the course of sin, either by amending them or by correcting them.

The iniquities which Habakkuk mentions are especially sins against the second table of the law (commandments 5 to 10, setting out our duties towards each other). The duties of the second table are a touchstone, by which we can test the sincerity of those who profess to be true believers within the visible church. Equally, when people once reveal their unsoundness by breaking these commandments, they may readily come to a very great height in such sins. Here, they had come to the extremity of “violence” among themselves.

The iniquity of a visible church may come to such heights that those who would normally want to stand in the gap to plead with God on the people’s behalf may be ready, if not to cry against them, yet to submit if God were to send judgements. Habakkuk is so hard pressed, with how their sin dishonours God, and oppresses the godly, that he cries that God would one way or other stop the course of their iniquity.

The godly, and especially those who are called to carry the Lord’s word to His people, have to factor into their expectations, not a smooth and easy life, but a life of wrestling under much humbling, toil and vexation. That was Habakkuk’s lot here, and the lot of the godly, in whose name he complains. Yet the best way to make people’s endeavours in their calling effectual (especially those who are employed in dealing with souls) is to be much with God in prayer. Cries to God are our best weapons against sin.

His concern

Habakkuk goes on to amplify his complaint. “Why dost thou show me iniquity, and cause me to behold grievance? For spoiling and violence are before me, and there are that raise up strife and contention” (Hab. 1:3).

This makes the reason why he was complaining clearer, and sets out more of the people’s sin. Their wickedness was seen in vexing and grieving one another, and the godly amongst them, and in their violent spoiling of one another, together with their way of starting and pursuing lawsuits and contentions All these were not only public and open in the view of Habakkuk and the godly, wherever they went, but a great grief and vexation to them. Their hearts were over-charged when they saw such wickedness — and God taking no action against it.

But when once people shake off the fear of God, it is righteous of Him to give them up to break all the bonds of love, humanity and civil society. These godless people are given up to iniquity, grievance, spoiling, violence, etc. In this way the Lord shows how unfixed people become in all things when they do not hold not fast the root of His fear.

Even though it is the duty of the Lord’s people and faithful servants, not to carve out what shall be their own lot and success in the world, yet they ought not only to keep themselves unspotted from the sins of their times, but to be seriously affected and vexed with these iniquities of the times. Habakkuk says, “Why dost thou show me iniquity, and cause me to behold grievance?” He is not so much quarrelling with God’s providence towards him as testifying to his own vexation and the vexation of the godly at seeing these things (Ezek. 9:4; 2 Pet. 2:7–8).

His ineffectiveness

Something else that adds weight to Habakkuk’s complaint (and displays yet more of the iniquity of the times) is taken from the consequence of God’s indulgence toward them — that they were emboldened to sin by it, and only grew worse in response to being spared! “Therefore the law is slacked, and judgment doth never go forth: for the wicked doth compass about the righteous; therefore wrong judgment proceedeth” (Hab. 1:4).

When the prophets preached, and the people rebelled, and yet God spared them, they took from this that they could despise the law and word of God as a dead thing, having no vigour nor authority, and so they ran on in all sorts of mad courses. As it so often proves, the Lord’s forbearance and long-suffering becomes a snare to the wicked, hardening them in their evil course. The effect was that no justice was to be found; for, if there were any who respected equity or right, they were so overpowered by the multitude of the wicked ones that they dared not appear, nor could achieve anything, and so justice was inevitably wrested.

The godly should endeavour to have their zeal against sin cleanly, and arising on justifiable grounds. Here Habakkuk makes it clear that his zeal against the iniquity of the times did not flow from any harm he sustained from it, but from the over-turning of all religion and the justice that appeared in it.

It is not simply the fact that we have the Word of God that will make us blessed, but when it has authority and vigour in our hearts and practices. This people had the law, but Habakkuk’s lament is that it was lifeless in its authority. “The law is slacked,” he says, using a figure of speech that refers to the faint or lifeless pulse of a dying man.

Contempt for the authority of God’s Word opens the door to all wickedness, for these two things are conjoined, “the law (of God)” and “judgment going forth.” Justice goes to ruin in society when Christianity has no place.

The guiltiness of a land reaches a terrible point when judicatories and courts of justice become corrupt. That is the height of their impiety, and the evidence of a despised law.

Times of general defection ordinarily prove to be times of great trial to the godly and righteous. “Then the wicked compasseth about the righteous, therefore wrong judgement proceedeth.” Not only are their souls vexed, and they are supplanted in their righteous cause, but they dare hardly appear against the stream of injustice. Or, if they do speak out, they are unable to bring about anything that is right, but everything keeps going wrong, whatever they do.

His worst fears confirmed

When the Lord answers Habakkuk, it is to give a terrifying announcement that the people would be destroyed by a Chaldean invasion (vv.5–11).

When people harden themselves in their evil ways because of God’s forbearance, and the Word has no authority among them, then the Lord will speak in a different way, i.e., by His rod. The Lord’s long-suffering patience toward impenitent sinners will not last for ever. When their iniquity comes to a height, it will end in sad judgements, and abuses of the mercy offered to the church deserves sadder judgements than the sin of heathens.

Yet it is usual that when judgement comes on an impenitent people, they don’t manage to interpret it properly, but are surprised with to the point of astonishment under it. This response flows from their now-ingrained contempt of God’s Word, a contempt which stupefies them to the extent that judgements cannot pierce their stupefaction. So it proves fruitless, and only portends the further ruin of those who continue in it. God is only just when those who dote on their privileges and despise the Word meet with unexpected and incredible judgements. Divine indignation against sin is more terrible, and will appear more sad when it is inflicted, than complacent sinners ordinarily imagine.

His bare faith

From verse 12 to the end of the chapter is Habakkuk’s response to this answer. In a speech directed to God, he confirms his own faith and the faith of the godly that God’s church will be preserved from destruction in this calamity, and not be totally extinguished by her captivity in Babylon. His confidence is in God’s covenant with them, His eternal immutability, His holiness, and His purpose, power, and providence in appointing the Chaldeans to punish and “correct” the church (but not destroy it).

When believers have God’s promise to preserve His church, they may humbly carve their own response according to it, and when they come to God in prayer, they may by faith tell Him what they are looking for and are confident of getting. This is how Habakkuk can tell the Lord, “We shall not die” (v.12).

When we know God as our own covenant-keeping Redeemer, we can derive comfort from Him in the saddest times. Habakkuk gathers his confidence from “the Lord my God.” Our faith is strengthened when we take in the nature, properties, and way of God, the covenant-making and promise-making God. “My God is Jehovah,” Habakkuk reasons, “able to give a being to things promised.” He is “from everlasting,” and so immutable in His purposes, and will eternally have a people to be His spouse and subjects. “He is from of old the Lord my God, or the church’s God, by a covenant of grace,” Habakkuk says. And “He is my Holy One,” without all taint of impurity, and therefore, as He disapproves of sin, and punishes it in His people, so He will not spare it in enemies, far less falsify His own covenant and the promise He made to His people.

 

READ MORE

LIKE THIS

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter and receive an updated article every week.

Showing and sharing the Messiah

Showing and sharing the Messiah

Showing and sharing the Messiah
George Hutcheson (1615-1674) ministered in Ayrshire and Edinburgh and was a noted bible expositor. Like many other ministers he was removed from his congregation in 1662 for refusing to conform to the rule of bishops.

Although the birth of Jesus was the turning-point of history it was still only an early step on the path He was purposefully taking towards His atoning death and glorious resurrection. With only a few exceptions, people didn’t recognise Him at His birth or throughout His childhood. It was not until His public ministry began, in His adulthood, that the good news started ringing out, “We have found the Messiah!” Two men chatting with John had their attention caught when Jesus was walking away from them. In the following updated extract, George Hutcheson takes us through John’s concern to point out the Lamb of God, the disciples’ longing to know Christ better, and then the impulse in every believer to bring others to know the Lord too.

Preachers must preach Christ

When Christ comes by, John points him out as the true sacrifice for sin, to the two disciples he was with (i.e., those who had embraced his doctrine, and were more than ordinary hearers). “John stood, and two of his disciples. And looking upon Jesus as he walked, he saith, Behold the Lamb of God” (vv.35–36).

As Christ does not fail to cast opportunities of well-doing in His servants’ way, so they ought to neglect no occasion of doing good, and of leading people to Christ. John had given testimony to Him the previous day, and today, as He walks by them, now going away, John will preach Him and point Him out, even to only two disciples.

Christ’s faithful servants will make conscience to exalt Him, and to lead people to Him, and not to themselves. Not only in public, where many may observe, but even in their most private conversations, it will be their care that those who respect them most would be led away from them to Christ.

A sight of Christ is not only an opportunity but a notable help to enable ministers to preach and point Him out to others. As John was looking on Jesus as He walked, he is encouraged to commend Him, and likewise a sight and enjoyment of His spiritual presence will notably equip ministers to speak of Him.

It is the duty of faithful ministers to be much in preaching Christ crucified, and pointing Him out as the only propitiatory sacrifice for sin. That is why John again points Him out in this way, “Behold the Lamb of God!” This is both a chief point of Christian knowledge, and a powerful means of conversion.

Christ crucified is the main attraction

The two disciples who John’s testimony affected were Andrew (v.40) and (probably) John (because he notes the circumstances in so much detail). Hearing John’s doctrine, they are taken with it, and follow Christ.

When Christ enquires what they are doing, they declare that they are seeking to Him as their teacher, and to have more acquaintance with Him. On this they are warmly invited to go with Him, and they stay with Him all night, learning excellent things.

Small ordinances and few words may do much good, when Christ is pleased to breathe, and something that has no effect at one time may yet be blessed at another. John’s short testimony works on both his hearers today, touching their hearts and drawing them to believe, though we read of no effect from the same doctrine more amply enlarged the day before.

Just as the doctrine of Christ as a sacrifice for sin is sweet to those who are trained in the school of repentance, as John’s disciples were, so it is also the chief instrument of conversion. Whatever other divine doctrine people receive, it will only turn them into moralists, unless they also receive and embrace the doctrine of Christ crucified, and Christ Himself displayed in it. That’s what makes people real Christians.

Those who rightly hear Christ preached will never get rest till they attain to some more acquaintance with Himself. These disciples “heard him speak, and they followed Jesus” (v.37). The heart touched by the Word is set on work to follow after and seek communion with Him. For this end, they will miss Him, and follow after Him, never resting till they get Him.

Christ notices who takes an interest in Him

Christ takes notice, and knows very well who it is who is following Him, even though His back seems to be toward them (it says He “turned, and sees them following,” v.38, indicating that He knew they were behind Him).

Although Christ seems to go away from these who follow Him, and lets them follow for a while, the reason for this is to stir them up, and exercise and reveal their faith all the more, and in the end, He will turn and manifest Himself to them.

Those who follow Christ should very seriously examine and enquire why they are doing so. Is it for an easy life and outward benefits, or for spiritual reasons? Are they seeking Christ Himself, or only His gifts? What estimation do they have of Him, if they are seeking Himself? Unless they do this, and unless they are single-minded in their aim, they will not find Christ giving them such a sweet welcome. That’s why Christ starts with the question, “What seek ye?” as needful to be answered, and till then He keeps a distance.

The disciples reply giving Him the title “Rabbi,” which is, “master,” or “teacher.” From this we can gather that one right goal in seeking Christ is, out of the sense of our ignorance and errors, to employ Him to be our soul’s master and teacher, the one who can infallibly and effectually instruct us.

Those who have any sound knowledge of Christ will use means to be more acquainted with Him, and those who come to Him for right ends will not have their errands with Him done quickly. They can’t get enough of Him! This much is indicated in the disciples’ answer, “Where dwellest thou?” It’s not so much about getting a little information about Him by the by, as because they want to have more familiar acquaintance with Him.

Those who seek Christ for Himself will get warm invitations and hearty hospitality from Him in the end. Just as they are not willing to be quickly done with Christ, so He will find means to hold them on with Him. “Come and see,” He says. He doesn’t say, “Let’s arrange something when you’re free,” but brings them along with Him. If we take it up spiritually, it indicates that Christ’s sincere followers will be made to know by experience the place where His honour dwelleth, by tasting the blessing of public ordinances, till they come to dwell with Him for ever. Also, they can better take up these things by seeing and experience, than by any report.

As soon as He said it, “they came and saw where he dwelt” (v.39). When Christ gives invitations, it is wise to embrace the offer, and not to delay, when either the Word or the lively working of the Spirit with it, is calling and alluring their hearts.

Those who follow Christ’s call, may not only get the good they expect, but His providence may cast unexpected benefits in their way. “They abode with him that day, for it was about the tenth hour” (v.39), or, according to the Jewish calculation (by which every day was divided into twelve hours, longer in summer and shorter in winter), two hours before night. They came only to know where He was staying, but providence ordered that they got a night’s lodging with Him, and so they could learn more of Him.

Christ’s new followers want others to follow too

“One of the two which heard John speak, and followed him, was Andrew, Simon Peter’s brother. He first findeth his own brother Simon, and saith unto him, We have found the Messias, which is, being interpreted, the Christ. And he brought him to Jesus” (vv.40–42).

Those who have gotten any knowledge of Christ, and are brought in to Him, ought to be careful to invite others to Him. True grace sanctifies natural affection, and makes you express that natural affection by seeking spiritual good to those to whom you are related by nature. So, “Andrew seeketh his own brother, Simon” (v.41).

“And he brought him to Jesus” (v.42). Whatever may be lacking in the light of the instruments who point out Christ, it will be made up for, if the hearer goes to Christ Himself. Faithful preachers will not be at ease till they draw hearers to Christ, and hearers should be tractable, when means are offered, and not stop short on the word of any man, but go to Christ themselves. Andrew has little more to say, but he draws Peter to Christ, and Peter goes with him.

Kindness begins on Christ’s side, and His grace goes before the sinner. Andrew found Peter before he even dreamed of such good news.

The finding of Jesus, the promised Messiah, is good news indeed, and the most excellent of purchases, for it makes the finder eternally happy. The good news that went around among them was, “We have found the Messias!” (v.41).

The titles given to Christ in Scripture are not to be lightly passed over, but pondered, for their meanings are for our edification and comfort. In particular, He has taken to Himself the title “the anointed one,” or “the Messiah,” or in Greek “the Christ,” in that He was anointed by the Spirit without measure for carrying out all His offices for the good of the church.

Christ will welcome those who come to Him, whoever were the instruments of their conversion, and however poor their outward condition is. He welcomes Peter, though he only came on account of a conversation with Andrew, as warmly as those who were called by John, and even though he was only poor Simon, the son of the fisherman Jona.

Christ gives a new nature to those who come to Him, and includes them in His family as children. This is what is indicated by Christ giving Peter a new name (v.42) — that he was now a born child in His family, and He was his father. Yet, at the same time, He puts him in mind that he is still “Simon the son of Jona” (v.42), for whatever dignity and excellency He confers on His converts, He does not want them to forget what they are in themselves, to still keep them humble, and to commend His grace the more.

FURTHER READING

Read more articles from the George Hutcheson blog

AUTHOR MENU

READ MORE

LIKE THIS

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter and receive an updated article every week.

What variety of worship does God accept?

What variety of worship does God accept?

What variety of worship does God accept?
George Hutcheson (1615-1674) ministered in Ayrshire and Edinburgh and was a noted bible expositor. Like many other ministers he was removed from his congregation in 1662 for refusing to conform to the rule of bishops.

According to Jesus, there is only one way of salvation and that is through Him. The distinctive claim of Christianity is that God accepts only the worship that is directed to Him via the Lord Jesus Christ by the Holy Spirit. However, a recent survey conducted in the USA indicates that only around half of evangelicals there concur with this claim (45%) while 47% accept the view that “God accepts the worship of all religions, including Christianity, Judaism and Islam.” Yet for thousands of years, the testimony of the one living and true God has been consistent. There is such a thing as false worship, which He does not accept. There is such a thing as heathen religion, which is offensive to the Lord God. Indeed, God is so particular about this that He does not accept even His own people’s attempts to worship Him when they mingle His ways with those of the heathen. We can only go so far in respecting and accommodating other religious beliefs and practices without compromising our faithfulness to the one true God. Many of His prophets reminded His people about this over the years, pointing out that blessing comes from loyalty to God and destruction from unfaithfulness. In the following updated extract, George Hutcheson presents the prophet Hosea’s message that God demands exclusive, dedicated worship and we risk ruining everything for ourselves if we are tempted to deviate from this.

Other ways of worshipping are sinful

In Hosea 13:1, the Lord’s message is, “When Ephraim spake trembling, he exalted himself in Israel, but when he offended in Baal, he died.”

Worshipping Baal is presented as idolatry, and as a sin which was destroying the people of Ephraim.

Ephraim was not only made a distinct tribe (though he was only the son of one of the twelve patriarchs) in preference to Manasseh (the elder brother), but was more dignified, numerous and influential than the rest.

But now, having brought in the pagan idolatry of Baal in the days of Ahab, Ephraim was become like a dead man. Ephraim was despoiled of authority, many of his subjects were cut off, and he was so broken in his former estate and dignity that he was not far from utter ruin.

Yes, Israel had previously made golden calves, which was also self-destructive idolatry, yet in serving them, they still made some pretence of acknowledging the true God. Now the Lord mentions only the idolatry of Baal, as the apex of their defection, because when they brought in pagan idols, they renounced Him.

Those who God has made very eminent may yet go very far wrong. Indeed, greatness may embolden people to sin. But when people fall away in this way, and abuse God’s generosity toward them, His kindness stands as a witness against them.

Sin will undoubtedly blast our eminency, both as individuals and nations, and will lay us low in reputation, estimation, and power. Even glorious Ephraim, when he offended, looked no more like what he was before than a dead man has the activity and vigour of one that is living.

But above all sins, idolatry, or corrupting religion, is a cause of corruption and decay to individuals and nations.

And although God is angry at all sorts of idolatry, yet He is more especially provoked when people renounce Him altogether, and choose an idol in His place, for the object of their worship. When people will not repent of lesser forms of idolatry, it is only justice when they are given up to this dreadful defection, which puts the certainty of their destruction beyond all doubt. Whatever Israel thought of their golden calves, now when Ephraim offends in Baal, it is undeniably just that he died for this abominable defection.

Ingratitude makes things worse

Notwithstanding their decaying situation, and the fact that God was still preserving them from utter destruction, they continued in their idolatrous worship of images and calves. “And now they sin more and more, and have made them molten images of their silver, and idols according to their own understanding, all of it the work of the craftsmen: they say of them, Let the men that sacrifice, kiss the calves” (Hosea 13:2).

For although Jehu had destroyed Baal and the Baal-worshippers, and God was in some measure upholding the kingdom under Jehu’s posterity, yet the people still adhered to the golden calves, and indeed they grew worse in following that sin, multiplying images according to their own pleasure and fancy. The rulers commanded the calves to be kissed (and the people encouraged one another to do so), as a certain sign of the reverence being given to them.

A habit which is hard to break

This multiplying of images more and more points to how the superstition of the people was growing. At first, they had the calves only at Dan and Bethel, yet afterward they also chose Gilgal, Gilead and Beersheba to be places of public worship. Not only so, but they multiplied little images and calves (as well as altars, Hosea 8:11; 12:11) for their private devotions at home.

Idolatry is a sin not soon abandoned, especially where it seems to serve and uphold an interest. Idolatry may in process of time become universal, and become the choice of a people who were not so willing to it before.

A sin which is impervious to correction

Impenitence after corrections, and God’s moderating of them, highly aggravates sin. Lesser sins, for which God will not destroy a people, will become grievous and heinous when continued in after corrections.

Those who are not reclaimed from idolatry by corrections, but persevere in it, will readily grow worse and worse. “Now they sin more and more.” Not only do they bewray more obstinacy and maliciousness in following their sin (when before it could be masked with a pretence of ignorance and infirmity), but they multiply the sin, “and have made them molten images” in addition to what they had before. It also aggravates the sin of idolatry that they pursue it so hotly as to spare no expense to promote it — their images were lavishly made out of silver.

A reverence which is transparently self-serving

Whatever people claim to represent by their images as the real object of their worship, yet images are idols in themselves. They do not represent the true God (as their worshippers make out) but an idol fancied by the deviser, and they will prove matter of sorrow and terror in the end. Their molten images are idols, and represent or bring to remembrance no thing in reality, even if they claim to make them in remembrance of the Lord who brought them out of the land of Egypt (1 Kings 12:28).

Following our own skill and prudence, rejecting God’s counsel and revealed will, is the false principle that begins and carries on all corruption in religion. They made idols “according to their own understanding.” They followed their own imagination and skill in making and multiplying them to further their devotion, as they called it.

Although the rulers commanded the people to give this sign of reverence, “Kiss the calves,” when they came to offer sacrifice, yet commands of authority do not take away the sinfulness of idolatry. Openly avowing idolatry within the visible church, and encouraging one another to it, makes it even more odious before the Lord. It is an addition to the sin, that, as their rulers gave out a wicked command, so the people yielded prompt and ready obedience, and strengthened one another in it.

God does not judge idolatry only by considering people’s intentions in what they do. There is also an external idolatry which He abhors, such as when a religious act of worship is performed towards some object, even if the worshipper claims only to be using that as a means of directing their worship towards God. Kissing the calves is condemned as an idolatrous act, whatever they claimed their intentions were.

A disloyalty which invites destruction

The destruction which this sin deserves is described in four similes — a cloud, the dew, chaff, and smoke — in Hosea 13:3: “Therefore they shall be as the morning cloud, and as the early dew it passeth away, as the chaff that is driven with a whirlwind out of the floor, and as the smoke out of the chimney.” These four similes point out that they will be driven out of their land and consumed, till they would (in a manner) come to nothing.

Nothing will be able to stand out against an angry God. All that the creature can oppose may be compared to the frailest things, and, for that matter, many similitudes are little enough to point out their frailty.

Great appearances of a flourishing condition do not guard against God’s hand. A great cloud overspreading the sky, and abundance of dew watering the earth, seem to promise much, but they soon pass away before the sun. Chaff lying secure among grain is soon driven swat by a whirlwind, and great puffs of smoke going out of a chimney soon scatter and vanish. Judgements on impenitent sinners will come swiftly and violently, and will bring utter desolation.

God does not forget His people

The Lord remembers how He had behaved towards His people. “Yet I am the LORD thy God from the land of Egypt, and thou shalt know no God but me: for there is no Saviour beside me. I did know thee in the wilderness, in the land of great drought …” (Hosea 13:4–5).

Before ever they knew idol calves, He had been good to them. In their deliverance from Egypt, He had proved Himself their God by many signs and wonders, including the covenant made with Abraham, which was solemnly renewed with them as a nation, in which He instructed and obliged them to their duty, and to the true religion, by uniting with Him, the only one who could prove a God and Saviour to them. To confirm them in this, He formally owned them to be His people, providing for them in the wilderness, where their food could be provided only by miracle.

Whatever course the declining people of God follow, yet experience will prove that they never thrive as they do in God’s way. When God covenants with anyone, He will support them in their low estate, and will prove His interest by deeds as their need requires.

The covenanted God will also renew His covenant even when His people have forgotten it, and forfeited their right to it. It was God’s great mercy to renew the covenant on Mount Sinai, shortly after they came out of Egypt, considering what they had been in Egypt (Eze. 20:7–8).

The great duty that lies on a covenanted people, and those who have reaped the fruits of God’s generosity, is to be dedicated to God as the only true God, their only delight and their refuge in all needs, and committed to the true religion, where His name is professed and acknowledged.

God does not seek a people to acknowledge Him because He needs them, but because it is entirely in their interests. They will find no God but Him, and they will find Him delighting to be a Saviour, something no one else can do. We acknowledge none but Him for, “there is no Saviour beside me.”

 

READ MORE

LIKE THIS

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter and receive an updated article every week.

How can we live life to the full

How can we live life to the full

How can we live life to the full
George Hutcheson (1615-1674) ministered in Ayrshire and Edinburgh and was a noted bible expositor. Like many other ministers he was removed from his congregation in 1662 for refusing to conform to the rule of bishops.

Our culture offers significance without transcendence — the prospect of finding meaning and fulfilment but in humanistic terms that make no reference to deity or the supernatural. This offer persists, even though by experience it continually founders on the very average, even mediocre, and largely unfulfilling reality of our everyday existence. By contrast, Christianity is unashamed to offer fulfilment outside of and beyond human activities and attainments — in life with Christ. This offer is realistic about our spiritual sickness and inertia, going so far as to identify our basic problem as spiritual death and ever-increasing corruption. But the life of Christ is the ineffable, abundant, fountain of the life of God Himself, and the good news is that this is what dead and dying sinners are invited to participate in. Several times in the Gospel of John, Jesus Christ is said to have life, or claims to be life, or says He will give sinners life. In the following updated extracts, George Hutcheson comments on the life — eternal life — which is available in and from Jesus for otherwise unfulfilled and perishing sinners.

Life is in Jesus

“In him was life, and the life was the light of men” (John 1:4).

Not only does the Lord Jesus have life in Himself essentially from the Father (John 5:26), but the life of all living creatures is “in him.” Life is in Him as in the fountain cause (as the stream is in the fountain, and rays of light are in the sun): and in Him still as the preserver when it is given (as the fountain constantly feeds the stream, so that it does not dry up).

Believers ought to study the Godhood of Christ their head, shining in His giving life to all living creatures, and their having their life still in Him, so that when they observe all the variety of living things, from the least to the greatest, which are fed by that fountain, they may come confidently to Him for life and enlivening, as He is the one who can create life. He is the one who can restore a soul, and bring to life a dead piece of clay. Then they need not be discouraged by their baseness when they come to Him (considering that He does not disdain to communicate life to the basest worm and smallest midgie) and they may hold their spiritual life from Him, abiding in Him in whom life still is, when they get it. Then too, they may not fear that their life will decay, when they dwell in the one in whom is the inexhaustible fountain of life, and the one who preserves and continues the life of all creatures.

He gives eternal life

“Whosoever believeth in him shall not perish, but have eternal life” (John 3:15).

Christ here points Himself out as the Saviour of sinners, having sufficient virtue to cure the sinfulness and misery of those who flee to Him by faith, and to keep them from perishing, and save them. It is only believing in Him, and laying hold on Him by faith, that brings a cure for the guilt of sin, the pain of conscience through sin, and the dominion of sin. Although all without Christ are in a state of perishing, and excluded from heaven, yet by faith in Him sinners are freed from death, and made heirs of life. “They shall not perish but have eternal life,” and this includes remission of sins, reconciliation to God, perseverance in the state of grace, and all the means leading to these ends.

Love gives everlasting life

“For God so loved the world, that he gave his only begotten Son, that whosoever believeth in him should not perish, but have everlasting life” (John 3:16).

The way of deliverance is not to be ascribed to anything in us procuring it (for God might justly have damned us all), but only to the free love of God. Love to lost sinners is not to be thought of as shining only in Christ (who willingly gave Himself to redeem), but also in the Father. The Father loved lost sinners, and sent His Son to suffer and to do the work of a mediator, so that through His mediation He would, not begin to love them, but convey the effects of His love in a way agreeable to his justice. God loved the world, and that preceded Him giving Christ, and was the cause of it.

Every one who believes in Christ is not only delivered from perishing by Christ’s undergoing wrath for him, but is instated in a right to eternal blessedness. This eternal blessedness the believer shall certainly attain, here in the pledge and bud, and hereafter in full enjoyment.

The blessedness which Christ purchased to believers is the only thing that really deserves the name of “life.” All other life is only a kind of death in comparison with it. It shall be blessedness eternally and without end.

Life flows out into eternity

Jesus said, “Whosoever drinketh of this water, shall thirst again. But whosoever drinketh of the water that I shall give him, shall never thirst: but the water that I shall give him, shall be in him a well of water, springing up into everlasting life” (John 4:13–14).

The water of life, although Christ purchased it, yet it must be His free gift to us (who cannot buy it), and His offer includes a promise of giving it to every one who will receive it in the due order. The promise is made indifferently, i.e., without respect of persons. He does not say, “I can give,” but, “I shall give him,” i.e., if he receives my offer, indefinitely, whoever he may be.

Anyone who partakes of the true grace of God in this way, it will refresh and satisfy him, so as to quench his thirst after vanity and earthly delights, and make these things tasteless. “Whosoever drinks of this water shall never thirst.”

The Spirit and grace of Christ in believers is not a stream or a pond, that may run dry, but “a well,” and a “springing” well, of inexhaustible fullness, virtue and refreshment. It is not the kind of well which may rot and make water taste bad, but a springing well, constantly fresh. It is not only a spring which keeps within its banks, but a well of water leaping up, and watering all around. The Spirit and grace of Christ flows out in all the activity of those who receive them, making them fruitful. It flows out also on others, to their good and edification.

As the truly godly have no limit to religion but eternity, and their desire is to keep fresh till the end, so, where the Spirit of Christ is, He will still be pouring out His virtue and riches from day to day, and letting out more and more to the sinner till eternity comes. Then, when all the banks of incapacity, sin, distance, ignorance, mortality, etc., have been broken down, and the windows of heaven have been opened, this stream and well becomes an ocean, and grace, smothered here under corruption and infirmity, gets leave to spread itself out freely in glory.

Life comes by hearing

Jesus said, “Verily, verily, I say unto you, The hour is coming, and now is, when the dead shall hear the voice of the Son of God, and they that hear shall life” (John 5:24).

The promises of eternal life are absolute in Christ’s intention toward His own people, and He undertakes to perform all the conditions which He requires of them, when they are humble and flee to Him.

Whatever remainders of the image of God people may have, and whatever excellencies, yet they are spiritually dead till Christ comes to them. They are destitute of spiritual life and of the favour and peace of God. They are dead, by a sentence of the law passed against them, unconscious of it and unable to help themselves.

But such is the power of the gospel, being the voice of the Son of God, that not only will it speak to those who have ears, but it will raise dead souls to life by conversion, and give them an ear to hear, and make them believe.

Those who are regenerated and raised from the dead by the Word of the gospel, and who embrace it (and Christ in it) by faith, the life that is begotten in them shall be cherished and nurtured and carried on by the enjoyment of the beginnings of conformity and communion with Christ, until it is perfected with glory. “They that hear (or, those who, being regenerated, are made to hear so as to believe) shall live.”

Jesus gives life more abundantly

Jesus said, “The thief cometh not but for to steal, and to kill, and to destroy. I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly” (John 10:10).

Those who make themselves out to be the Messiah, or who run unsent and bring in corrupt doctrine, Christ declares to be enemies, and not shepherds. They come only to do the flock harm. But His business is to give them life, and life in great abundance.

Christ is the kind of shepherd who will be so far from destroying His flock that He will “give life,” even to those of them who are dead.

Christ’s great aim in coming to the world is to purchase and confer life on His own elect people. However He treats them, yet it all tends towards this great aim. When they think it otherwise, it is their own mistake, “for,” He says, “I am come that they might have life.”

By His coming, Christ intends not only life to His flock, but “more abundant life.” He will not only give the life that will simply supply the basic needs of His people, but such a super-abounding measure that it will testify to His fullness, and completely refresh them.

Once He has conferred this abundant life in conversion, He will make it grow more and more while they are within time (1 Thess. 4:1–4). Yet all this is but a drop, in comparison of the abundance of life that is reserved for His people in glory. In these respects He says, “I am come that they might have life, and that they might have it more abundantly.”

Jesus gives us life by His death

He said, “I lay down my life for the sheep” (v.15, v.17–18).

Christ, held out with His ignominious cross, is the great stumbling-block of the world. Yet, although the shame and ignominy joined to the cross add to its grievousness, it could not hold Christ back from undergoing it, and indeed He provides various considerations to make it appear lovely.

He declares that the Father loves Him because of this suffering. The Father is so well pleased with the reconciliation of lost sinners that He both loves Christ for taking on the work, and is fully satisfied with how His suffering attains that goal.

Also, He declares that He was to lay down His life, not to continue as the prisoner of death, but so that, having paid the ransom, He could take His life again, with the Father’s approval.

Finally, He declares that He did all this in obedience to the Father’s command. The way of accomplishing our redemption was agreed on between the Father and the Son in advance.

READ MORE

LIKE THIS

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter and receive an updated article every week.

How sinful leaders bring the people down with them

How sinful leaders bring the people down with them

How sinful leaders bring the people down with them
George Hutcheson (1615-1674) ministered in Ayrshire and Edinburgh and was a noted bible expositor. Like many other ministers he was removed from his congregation in 1662 for refusing to conform to the rule of bishops.

Although there are plenty deep-seated problems in society it can sometimes seem that the ruling classes are operating on a different plane. There is a top-down imposition of progressive policies which are not only out of tune with the electorate’s concerns but also from a moral and ethical point of view not in the nation’s interests. Multiple scandals in the UK in recent years have contributed to a deep disillusionment with both elected and unelected authorities and a feeling that successive governments can work with striking efficiency in their own interests but are aimless and incompetent when it comes to the citizens they ostensibly serve. Church leadership is not much different and many people who retain some respect for Christian values and ideals write off the institutional church as rotten and venal. The prophet Micah had the courage and perseverance to challenge both state and church authorities for their sins. In the following updated extract, George Hutcheson explores Micah’s critique and the culpability of those who hold office in church and state.

Leaders in church and state are culpable

In chapter 3, verses 9 to 11, Micah speaks faithfully to all sorts of rulers, both civil and ecclesiastical, conjointly. He sets before them their sin, and how they had procured the ruin of Zion. He accuses the state authorities because although they ought to have been patrons of justice, they abhorred and perverted it. Instead of adorning the holy city with justice and judgment, all they cared about was stately buildings, and they raised funds for that by cruel oppression. Micah accuses them all generally of perverting justice through bribery and covetousness. The churchmen were mercenary, and made their calling subservient to their gain. Yet all of them were carnally confident, and presumptuous about having God’s favour and presence among them, assuming that they would be exempt from judgment.

When people in eminent places have become accustomed to sin, they are usually deaf to what the Lord says. They must be called often to “hear” (v.1, v.2, v.9). The messengers of the Lord must not give up when their message is not received. They must announce it until either they are listened to, or they have delivered their own souls. “Hear, I pray you,” Micah repeats. Yet, when faithful ministers reprove the faults of rulers, they must give evidence that they do not despise their authority when they do so. They must not be lacking in giving any signs of respect which are due to them.

God particularly hates perversity

The Lord’s quarrel against people is not so much for sins of ignorance or infirmity, as for sins that flow from a perverse disposition. They go wrong, because they love to do so, and they hate what is right. Micah accuses them of “abhorring judgment, and perverting all equity” (v.9).

Then the Lord tolerates no pretences to palliate any sinful deed. It is no excuse to claim they are building Zion, if they are doing so “with blood and iniquity,” or with goods taken by bloody oppression from the poor. On the contrary, this kind of excuse only makes things worse, defiling all the more what they are endeavouring to cleanse.

The Lord allows those who are employed in public office in church or state to have their maintenance. But to receive payment or gifts so as to judge partially, because of the gifts received, is gross iniquity. “The heads judge for reward” is the Lord’s quarrel with them. “Judging for reward, teaching for hire, and divining for money” comes to the same thing as false judgment, erroneous teaching and erroneous divination, for it is a true saying, “a gift blindeth the wise,” etc (Exodus 23:8).

Presumption makes things much worse

Presumption will feed people with delusion under very gross sins, and even when judgment is near. “Yet will they lean upon the Lord” (v.11). The external privileges of the church, and external reformation of worship, are ordinarily turned by complacent sinners into a snare or plague to themselves. These things make them dream of being in God’s favour, and of peace, when wrath is upon them, and trouble at hand.

But external privileges will not exempt profane sinners from deserved judgment, nor will external reformation. Rather it will make them ripen for judgment the faster. God will approve of no “faith” but the kind that is fruitful, and stirs people up to purify and cleanse their hearts and ways. Micah challenges them because, when they are continuing in all their iniquities, they claim to “lean on the Lord,” and say, “Is not the Lord among us?” (v.11).

But the Lord threatens that, for their sins, the stately buildings of the holy city would be made desolate heaps. The ground it was situated on, especially the kingly palace, would become arable land, and be ploughed as a common field, and Mount Moriah, the mountain on which the temple stood, would become wild and uninhabited, like a forest (v.12).

No place or visible church has any privilege, but sin will make it desolate. No place had the promises that Zion, Jerusalem, and Mount Moriah had, yet these judgments were coming their way.

We are all implicated in the sins of our context

The servants of God must be bold and faithful like Micah, not only in speaking against the sins of the rulers, but even against a church with great privileges when she is found in transgression. Jeremiah quotes this passage as an evidence of Micah’s faithfulness (Jeremiah 26:18).

It is our duty to look at sin and be affected with it, not only because it brings down judgments on ourselves, but especially as it plays a part in drawing down calamities on the church and kingdom where we live. This is what Micah tells them. “For your sake,” all of these things will come (v.12).

Universal defection in a land, especially in rulers and teachers in their offices and judicatories, will bring on speedy desolation, unless repentance prevents it (as happened in Hezekiah’s days; Jeremiah 26:18–19). Leaders in church and state, through their corruption, were chiefly responsible for procuring this ruin, and could not but involve the people in their defection, in a way that hastened the judgment.

The inevitable connection between sin and judgment

Judgments are most severe and sharp on a backsliding church, even if they are moderated towards the elect. Treating with contempt the mercy offered to the church is such a great sin that nothing less is threatened here than being “ploughed as a field, made into heaps, and made like the forest.” When this warning was first made, in Hezekiah’s time, the threatened judgment was lifted when they repented. Then, it does not seem to have been accomplished at the first destruction of the temple. Yet secular history informs us that when the temple was destroyed the second time, the Romans did, according to their custom, plough up the very ground where the temple had stood, as a sign of perpetual desolation.

This is how infallibly certain the word of God is. The threatening was delayed after repentance, and then after many troubles they had been delivered, and so might think they had done with it. Yet when they sinned anew, and renewed their provocations, they find that the sentence against them still stands, and eventually it takes effect.

READ MORE

LIKE THIS

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter and receive an updated article every week.

The changing tides of history

The changing tides of history

The changing tides of history
George Hutcheson (1615-1674) ministered in Ayrshire and Edinburgh and was a noted bible expositor. Like many other ministers he was removed from his congregation in 1662 for refusing to conform to the rule of bishops.

It seems that globally, our turbulent times are only becoming more uncertain, with threats of war on an increasing scale, and oppressive regimes across the world getting the upper hand. The tides of history are changing yet again, with once unchallengeable dogmas now being overturned and conventional wisdom seeming suddenly outdated. Francis Fukuyama, who coined the term “the end of history,” once argued that Western liberalism was the end point of mankind’s ideological development. Now, however, in response to the landslide US election, he has suggested that classical liberalism itself is in decline. Whatever stance we take in discussions like this, the Lord is still working inexorably towards accomplishing His own purposes, even though the process may be inexplicable and the outcome unimaginable to us. In his analysis of the prophecy of Joel, George Hutcheson identifies several seemingly incompatible strands to the Lord’s care of His church. For one thing, the Lord allows His church to be suppressed and harassed by His enemies. For another thing, this experience of evil actually works for the church’s good. Then again, all the hostile activity of the enemies against the church only ends up contributing to their own destruction. Whatever changes and upheavals take place, and whatever our opinion of the rise and fall of political parties, the Lord’s flock is at the centre of all His workings in human history and, as the following updated extract from Hutcheson’s commentary shows, faith grasps the fact that the Lord’s glory will not be diminished in all of this.

The Lord is still able to save His people

We see from Joel 3 that in opposition to the cruelty of their enemies, and indeed for a recompense of their cruelty, the Lord passes sentence in favour of His people. He commits Himself to gather His people, and bring them out from under their bondage, and to reward these enemies.

We learn from this that, whatever projects there may be against the church, yet they will never win their point against her. Though they wanted to have the Jews so far removed that they would never return, yet, He says, “I will raise them up” (Joel 3:7).

The Lord can restore His people whenever it pleases Him, and when His time comes, neither His former rejecting of them, nor their desperate condition, will hinder it. Though they were sold, so that they would never return, yet, He says, “I will raise them out of the place whither ye have sold them” (v.7).

God can deliver His people, even though their condition seems as hopeless as that of raising dead men (Eze. 37:11–12), and even supposing they themselves have as little thought of deliverance as someone who is asleep. “I will raise them” in the original means “I will awake them.”

The Lord’s people may expect great things

The wonderfulness of what God promises should be no impediment to our faith. God both can and will bring about the deliverance of His people in an admirable way, as something to “Behold” (v.7).

The mere fact that enemies triumph for a long time, is no reason not think that they will always escape. God, in due time, at the deliverance of His people, will repay them for all they have done. When God performs all this deliverance for His people, it is added, “and will return your recompense upon your own head” (v.7).

God will repay enemies using the same measure that they have measured to His people. He may even make His church instrumental in doing so. Yet, however the judgement may be executed, He is still the principal agent in it. “I,” he says, “will sell your sons and your daughters into the bands of the children of Judah” (v.8), i.e., “deliver them into their hand, and put them under their power, to be at their disposal.” “And they shalt sell them to the Sabeans, to a people far off.” The Sabeans were on the remote coasts of Arabia, or, it may be understood that the Sabeans would sell them to a people yet more remote. In which sentence we should see the justice of God, in dealing with them as they had dealt with Judah.

God’s Word is sufficient for the church to rest on in expecting the greatest things. It should be sufficient ground of terror to enemies, that the Word hath spoken sad things against them. This is why it is added, by way of confirmation, “For the Lord hath spoken it” (v.8).

The Lord’s methods are marvellous

What follows in verses 9 to 12 is a description of the way that this sentence will be executed. First, the enemies will be summoned to convene together. They shall be gathered together by the effectual providence of God to fight against His people. They shall prepare as much armour as they can, and shall encourage one another to go to war, and even the weak shall take courage to embark on this enterprise. They will convene not a few, but many on every hand, more than enough to encircle the people of God. Yet even so, the Lord will have His own mighty instruments for executing vengeance. All their efforts will only be a way of bringing them to the place which He has appointed for judging them (v.12).

The activities of enemies are only in the service of God’s providence. They are only doing what He stirs them up to do in order to bring about His holy ends. This proclamation, “Prepare war, wake up the mighty men, etc.” (v.9), tends to show that their projects are all of God, so as to bring about His purposes.

God is not afraid of people’s efforts, nor of the courage of the mighty, nor of their vigilance, activity, numbers, preparations. He does not need to steal a march on them, but can let them do their utmost, and then work His point by it, and make their purposes void. What they wish to do, He calls on them to do, and to make every effort in it, all so that His glory may shine in defeating them in it. See Isaiah 8:9–10.

Crossing the Lord’s purposes will always backfire

People may have much resolution, and great undertakings. There may be much courage and eagerness, even among the weakest. They may be encouraging each other to work, and laying aside other employments so that they may carry out this work with all seriousness. Yet they are only running to their own destruction. They are “waking up,” or stirring themselves up, they are “coming up” against hilly Judea, and they are laying aside husbandry, “beating their ploughshares into swords, and their pruning hooks into spears,” when yet God is convening them for judgment (v.9–10).

War is a scourge full of evils, and an enemy to profitable callings, including husbandry. Whereas they beat their ploughshares into swords, in a time of peace, it is the opposite. Whatever is the Lord’s purpose in assembling enemies, yet the church has great difficulty in it. The church may even be surrounded on all hands with difficulties and dangers arising from it, before the situation is resolved. To say, “Assemble yourselves, and come, all ye heathen, and gather yourselves together round about,” implies that these enemies shall first surround the church on every hand, before God appears against them. See Revelation 10:9.

God will make use of His enemies gathering themselves, to make sure that they do not flee from His judgments. He will deal with them as delinquents brought before His tribunal, in the place which He has appointed.

Praying to the Lord is always a safe refuge

The fact of the Lord distressing the church by enemies is a call to her to pray, and to look to Him as the only one who can secure her. As she should not rest on simply being afflicted, as if that were enough to plead pity when she is not crying to God, so she should not be diffident, nor discouraged, about calling on Him, whatever her distress may be. Subjoined to this great distress is the prayer, “Thither cause thy mighty ones to come down” (v.11), indicating that the church’s refuge at that time will be prayer to the Lord.

God has plenty of both power and instruments, who are able to work for His church when she calls to Him, even if all the world was against her. “Cause thy mighty ones to come down” implies a promise that He will provide instruments armed with His power, whom He will bring to this gathering. Yet He will first put His church to intreating Him to do it for her (as in Ezekiel 36:37). It is needless to inquire who these “mighty ones” are, whether angels inflicting some extraordinary judgment, or the enemies themselves, gathered together in this manner, who He will enable to cut off one another.

It is a heathen-like sign when people come up in opposition to the church of God. That is why they are so often called “the heathen” here. We may understand it to mean only the nations, which were all heathens in Joel’s time, whatever religion they followed. Yet all those who want to suppress the church of the true God prove themselves to be heathens, especially those who would wish to crush the church of Israel now that they have turned to God after their long rejection.

The Lord wants His people to be infallibly assured that He is not at all troubled by the opposition of enemies. Although they may often be shaken with the thought of the formidable power and preparations of their enemies, yet they should collect themselves, and see God’s over-ruling hand in all of them.

FURTHER READING

Read more articles from the George Hutcheson blog

AUTHOR MENU

READ MORE

LIKE THIS

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter and receive an updated article every week.

Five comforting promises for the troubled church

Five comforting promises for the troubled church

Five comforting promises for the troubled church
George Hutcheson (1615-1674) ministered in Ayrshire and Edinburgh and was a noted bible expositor. Like many other ministers he was removed from his congregation in 1662 for refusing to conform to the rule of bishops.

With the church in a period of decline, it is hard to know whether the bigger threat comes from within or without. The short and often overlooked prophecy of Obadiah seems to focus largely on external threats. As George Hutcheson notes in his commentary on Obadiah’s prophecy, the first part of the prophecy exposes the futile self-confidence of those who were hostile to the Lord and explains what severe consequences will follow their opposition and violence against the Lord’s people. But even while surrounded by problems and enemies, the Lord’s people are sustained by the faithfulness of the Lord. Hutcheson identifies five comforting promises which Obadiah announces for the troubled church. Whatever partial fulfilments of these promises we may identify in the experience of the church so far, Hutcheson is looking ahead to a comprehensive fulfilment in times to come.

A promise of restoration

From verse 17 to the end, this prophecy contains comforting promises to the church now in trouble. Although Judah had some taste of the fulfilment of these promises at their return from captivity and afterwards, and although the New Testament church has a continual fulfilment of them in a spiritual way, yet at least some of these promises seem to point more especially at the time of the conversion and saving of “all Israel,” as the apostle calls it in Romans 11.

In verse 17 the church is promised three kinds of things — deliverance and relief from her troubles; holiness and the privileges she had previously enjoyed; and the restitution of their previous possessions. This is promised not only to the Jews, in reference to what they were deprived of by the captivity, but to the whole “house of Jacob,” in reference to what was given them by the covenant, made with their fathers, which is yet unaccomplished.

Although in the time of the church’s trouble, the Lord withholds from her the possession of her pleasant things, yet His thoughts and purposes of love are still as large and sure to her as ever. She may read this from the Word, even though she does not see it in providence. That is why the time of Judah’s trouble is a time when He makes many promises.

Deliverance

Even in the church’s greatest afflictions, not only are there some who will escape (it being impossible that she should totally perish), but she may expect complete deliverance from all her evils in due time. “Upon Mount Zion shall be deliverance.”

Holiness

Holiness is the inseparable companion of deliverance, and is also a means of bringing deliverance to the church, for when there is deliverance, there shall be holiness. Holiness is both an evidence that God dwells in the church (and He will establish His own habitation), and a token that God will preserve them as His consecrated people, and not permit them to be profaned and polluted by the invasion of enemies as they have been. In this way, holiness is also sometimes to be taken as the fruit of the holy Lord dwelling among them, and setting them apart for Himself, and as the free reward of their pursuit of holiness (Joel 3:17; Isa. 52:1).

Holiness is not only the church’s duty to pursue, but the Lord’s promise to fulfil. He undertakes to work it in her. “There shall be holiness” is a promise that they shall be a holy people, and enjoy God’s presence in holy ordinances, and be preserved from the violence of enemies.

Restitution

The mercies of the church, whether spiritual or temporal, insofar as God has promised them and they need them, are sure, and these mercies will be restored to them after they have been suspended from the comfort and use of them for a long time. “The house of Jacob shall possess their hereditary possessions” (as the word is) after long captivity and exile.

A promise of victory

The next promise (verse 18) is of the utter ruin of Edom, and of all the most inveterate enemies (such as Edom was) of the church, and especially of the church of converted Israel, who shall be the occasion and cause, if not also the instruments, of their enemies’ destruction.

The church of God will never be short of inveterate and cruel enemies, nor difficulties, while she is in the world. For, not only Judah in the time of their captivity, but the church in her restoration by Christ, and “the house of Jacob and Joseph” (which takes in all Israel, and the ten tribes expressly), when they share of this deliverance, have a “house of Esau” against them. There is no time in which the church has corruptions, but she is to expect difficulties in it.

Yet, the opposition of enemies against the church only contributes to making way for God to let out many proofs of His love in helping and delivering her.

Opposition to the church is a certain pledge of the utter destruction of those who oppose her, and the Lord is able (when He pleases) to make His weak people strong to bring it about. This promise that “Jacob shall be a fire” etc., indicates not only that Edom shall be utterly consumed, as a flame consumes stubble, but that their meddling with the church shall be cause of their ruin. It’s as if stubble, endeavouring to put out a fire, was burnt up itself.

The Word of God, and the omnipotence and fidelity of God who speaks it, is sufficient to confirm the church’s faith in the certainty of highly improbable things. Whatever unlikelihood there may be in this promise, it is removed by this, “For the Lord hath spoken it.”

A promise of expansion

It is further promised (verses 19 and 20) that the church shall not only have restitution but the enlargement of their possessions. They will enjoy all their own, and possess what had belonged to their enemies.

The promise teaches us that the afflictions of the church, through God’s blessing, contribute towards her advantage and gain. The captivity are to get not only their own land, but also “the mount of Esau and the Philistines,” and what they did not have before their captivity.

Christ in His church will gain ground on His enemies. He will possess and reign over them, either by their voluntary conversion, or by violent subjection and destruction. Meanwhile, the privileges of the people of God are irrevocable and inevitable, and will burst out in comforting fruits even after long and sad interruptions. “Israel shall possess the fields of Ephraim, and Samaria, and Benjamin with Gilead (as the original has it)” of which they have been so long deprived.

The Lord notices every distress and captivity of his people, and what becomes of them, and may manifest much of His goodness to those whom He has sore afflicted and brought down with corrections. Although the captivity were sent away in much ignominy, and were carried far off, yet the Lord notes that they are the captivity, and where they are, and promises that He will restore them to their possessions, and cause them to possess the gates of their enemies.

A promise of preachers

There is a further promise in verse 21 — of fit instruments, who will be raised up in the church to deliver her, and to manage the cause of God against enemies, just like long ago, when the Lord raised up judges to deliver Israel. We are to understand this not only spiritually (that Christ will send the church His apostles and messengers, who instrumentally save the elect (1 Tim. 4:16) by holding forth Christ in the Word of salvation, and by their doctrine do condemn the world): but that in all ages, and especially in the church of converted Israel, God will raise up instruments of deliverance to the church, as He also did in the times between the captivity and the coming of Christ.

The church of Christ will not lack fit instruments to promote her happiness, for, “saviours shall come up on Mount Zion.” The allowance of the church of God is salvation, both eternal and temporal also, in so far as is fit for her to receive. This is why the instruments sent to her are called “saviours,” i.e., in an instrumental way.

The doctrine of the gospel in the mouth of Christ’s servants, reproves, judges and condemns the world, and all the enemies of Christ, and this judgement is reinforced with spiritual (and sometimes temporal) plagues, till the day comes when they shall receive a complete recompense.

As the Lord is sovereign in all the world (even over his enemies), so, when He raises up instruments for the church’s good, He will bless them, and by them He will bring His enemies to account, and will execute His sentence against them.

A promise of Christ’s reign

The last and great promise is (verse 21b), that God in His Christ shall have a kingdom in His church, and among their enemies, for their benefit.

Where Christ sets up His church, there He sets up His kingdom also, and will be acknowledged as such. “The kingdom shall be the Lord’s.” No dominion or sovereignty is to be acknowledged in the true church, but Christ’s only. He alone has power to make laws binding the conscience, to institute ordinances, enjoin censures, appoint officers, and by His own courts to judge His own house, etc. All other “saviours,” or instruments of deliverance, must serve Him, and His officers must content themselves with His ministry.

The kingdom of Christ is matter of comfort to the true church and the godly, as it is sweet to live under his yoke and protection. Christ holds His kingdom by a certain and firm tenure. It is made sure to Him by the infallible promise of God, as here recorded in Holy Scripture. On this ground the church, notwithstanding all opposition, may expect the day when “the kingdoms of this world shall become the kingdoms of our Lord, and of his Christ, and he shall reign for ever and ever” (Rev. 11:15).

READ MORE

LIKE THIS

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter and receive an updated article every week.

How can we expect things to get better?

How can we expect things to get better?

How can we expect things to get better?
George Hutcheson (1615-1674) ministered in Ayrshire and Edinburgh and was a noted bible expositor. Like many other ministers he was removed from his congregation in 1662 for refusing to conform to the rule of bishops.

With election season ongoing in the UK and the USA, it provides opportunity to analyse the state of the nation and decide whose vision for the future we prefer. An honest evaluation from the perspective of God’s law can only conclude that over the past few decades, society and leaders have conspired together to encourage each other to abandon God’s ways. The result has not been greater human flourishing but more disregard for the vulnerable and the resurgence of various forms of oppression through for example the cost of living crisis, widening access to abortion, carelessness about predatory men gaining access to children and women, and failures in social care disadvantaging the elderly and those with disabilities. Can anything much be salvaged from the wreckage, though, if we are not on God’s side and while God withholds His approval? The prophet Micah brought urgent warnings from the Lord for rulers in particular. George Hutcheson discusses Micah’s words in the following updated extract from his commentary. Although God certainly holds each individual responsible for their own sins, Micah also insists that the ruling classes are themselves accountable to God for how they (mis)use their power in the nation. This holds equally true for those seeking to remain in power and those seeking to win the election. When rulers become oppressors and turn a blind eye to the miseries of the poor, there is something fitting about God refusing to help them in their own time of need.

In the opening two chapters of his prophecy, Micah has faithfully exposed the sins of the body of this people, and denounced God’s judgments because of sin. Now in chapter 3 he comes more particularly to reprove the rulers of both church and state, especially in Judah, and to threaten them with the consequences of their sins.

He does this firstly by distinct groupings, in relation to their own particular punishments. The princes, who ought to know right and wrong, and walk accordingly, were yet the most perverse and inhumane in oppression (Micah 3:1–3). Micah warns them that in their time of difficulty they shall not be acknowledged by God (v. 4). The false prophets, who deluded the people, and preached in whatever way would be most subservient to their base ends (v.5), are threatened with such confusion as would make them ashamed of their trade (v.6–7), whereas Micah, a faithful man, would faithfully persist in his duty (v.8).

He also deals with the rulers conjointly, in relation to the judgement which by their sin they had procured to come on the church of God. The rulers perverted justice (v.9), and built the holy city with goods taken by oppression (v.10). Generally, both rulers in the state and teachers in the church were corrupted with bribes, and love for gain, and yet would presumptuously rely on God (v.11). He therefore warns that for their sake Sion would be laid desolate (v.12).

The ruling class should know the law

“Hear, I pray you, O heads of Jacob, and ye princes of the house of Israel, is it not for you to know judgement?” (v.1) Micah challenges the rulers in peace and war, for affected ignorance of the law of God. He lays the basis for showing how aggravated their wickedness was, in that they should be concerned to be even better acquainted than others with the will of God in the matter of justice and equity. Although they ought to be exemplary in their knowledge and obedience, (knowledge including consequent affection and practice), in their practice they proved that they either were ignorant of the law, or else they despised it.

When a land in general is culpable of defecting from God’s ways, rulers in church and state have their own eminent guilt in it. This is implied in the general theme of what Micah says, as, having reproved the whole body of the people, he now comes to challenge the rulers in an especial manner. “Hear, O heads of Jacob.”

Micah’s practice shows us that faithful ministers ought not only to inveigh against sin in general, or the sin of the common people only, but they ought in particular to reprehend the sins of every rank, even of rulers. Those of greatest eminency are bound to hear God speaking by His messengers, and to receive what messages are sent to them, as being under the law just as others are.

As rulers especially are unwilling to be brought to an account for their ways by the ministry of the Word, so ministers are bound to omit no point of discretion, and tender persuasiveness, which would be consistent with their fidelity and zeal against sin, and which may be instrumental to make the word take, and not be stumbled at. We can see this from Micah’s way of entreaty, “Hear, I pray you,” which indicates both that the rulers were averse to hearing, and that Micah tenderly reached out in order that they would hear.

Beside the general obligation lying on all (especially within the visible church) to know and obey the will of God, it is especially incumbent on rulers and great ones among the Lord’s people to do so. By reason of their education, means, encouragements, leisure, offices, etc., they are enabled with advantages, and bound to know more than others, and to put their knowledge into practice, in order that they may be examples to others.

However opposed people may be to the challenges of ministers in the matter of affected ignorance, or wilful neglect of known duties, yet these excuses will not satisfy their own consciences, when they are seriously put to it. That’s why Micah confronts them with a question which they could not deny. “Is it not for you to know judgement?”

Their knowledge should be put into practice

The Lord does not reckon that people know anything, when the truth they know has no place in their heart, and they make no endeavours to put it into practice. That’s how Micah explains that they “do not know judgment” — it was that they “hated the good” (v.2), and oppressed the people (v.2–3).

The Lord notices chiefly the disposition and affection of people’s hearts towards good or evil. It is a desperate condition, when not only your practice is out of course, but your affections also are alienated from God and inclined to evil. “You hate the good, and love the evil.”

Whatever oppressors may claim to be the cause of their cruelty toward those they oppress (e.g., they stood in need, and needed to live of their own, etc.), yet the Lord sees it to flow from their perverse and corrupt affections. That’s why He says of oppressors, “Ye hate the good, and love the evil.”

God sees it when they oppress the people

In opposition to what the rulers ought to be, Micah sets forth their disposition and practice. They abhorred what was good, and loved what was evil. They oppressed and undid the Lord’s people so cruelly, by taking away the very means of their subsistence and livelihood, that it was as if they had flayed their skin from off them, eaten their flesh, and broken their bones to boil them for meat, the way butchers and cooks do with animals for food (v.2–3).

The greatest perversity is usually found in those who ought, and may, and will not, or neglect to make use of such means as might promote piety and justice. All this perversity is in “the heads of Jacob,” who had means and opportunity to set them doing otherwise.

Oppression is, in God’s account, inhumane butchery, and murder, in a degree far above simple slaughter, while the oppressed pine away for want, and the oppressors (like barbarians, or wild beasts) eat that which is the very life and flesh of the poor.

However, although magistrates and great ones think themselves to be above all law, yet they have no right to oppress a people (especially if they are God’s people) and deal with them simply as they wish. Rather, they are accountable for how they have treated them. Here they are challenged by God for how they are oppressing His people. The oppressed — or others — perhaps do not dare to challenge them for their injurious dealings, yet there is a God who will lay it to their charge.

God will disown them in their time of crisis

The sentence which will be particularly passed on them is by way of retaliation. As they had oppressed the poor and turned a deaf ear to their cries, so they will meet with judgment without mercy or compassion. God will not pay attention to them, even if (out of a sense of their trouble) they seek Him.

For it says, “Then shall they cry unto the Lord” (v.4). They will be forced to seek God, whom they otherwise disregarded. Even the greatest, and those who most wickedly forget God, shall at one time or other be conscious of God’s reverence, and will send their errand His way. Natural (unspiritual) people may make some show of seeking God in trouble — not in faith, or out of love, but out of sense of trouble. The general calamities which were previously threatened, or their own particular corrections for their sin, press down on them, and “then shall they cry.”However, it is righteous with God not to heed this crying of the wicked in their trouble, because of their previous wickedness and ongoing unsoundness, and in particularly, so that He may recompense them for not hearkening to the cry of the poor who they had oppressed. “They shall cry unto the Lord, but he will not hear them.”

“He will hide his face from them at that time” of trouble. It is extreme misery to be deserted totally by God in trouble, and to lack His favour and sense of reconciliation, which would support them in any extremity.

“He will even hide his face from them at that time, as they have behaved themselves ill in their doings.” Although God sometimes in a sense hides His face from His own children, in order to test their faith, His intention, when He disregards the wicked in trouble, is so that wickedness would be seen and lamented as the cause of it.

READ MORE

LIKE THIS

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter and receive an updated article every week.

Martha and the resurrection

Martha and the resurrection

Martha and the resurrection
George Hutcheson (1615-1674) ministered in Ayrshire and Edinburgh and was a noted bible expositor. Like many other ministers he was removed from his congregation in 1662 for refusing to conform to the rule of bishops.

The sisters of Lazarus, Martha and Mary, sent for Jesus urgently when their brother was ill. But by the time Jesus arrived in Bethany, Lazarus was dead and buried. What was Jesus doing? In the heart of Martha, grief and faith were in turmoil. She was sorrowing and questioning and at the same time reaching for and clinging desperately to Jesus. As Jesus spoke to her, He interacted with her so very tenderly and led her on gently to see more and more of the comfort which God has so richly stored up in Him for His needy people. Jesus saying, “I am the resurrection and the life,” is both a foundational bedrock of support for all believers, and also something that applies personal, individual comfort in each believer’s unique circumstances. The resurrection is not a far-distant abstraction, when we realise that Christ Jesus is “the resurrection” and that He continually maintains His people in life. In the following updated extract, George Hutcheson points out the striking features of the dialogue between Jesus and Martha.

Grief is complex, even in believers

Martha was a good woman, and conscious of her loss as much as Mary was. She gets first word of Christ’s approach, and goes to meet Him, while Mary knew nothing of this, and stayed indoors.

Among those who are truly gracious, some are more tender and spiritual then others. Some are more affected with griefs, and more broken under them, than others. This may teach the godly, and especially weak and tender hearted ones, not to measure every one by themselves, for those who have real good, may have really different dispositions.

Whatever comfort or sympathy people meet with from friends in their trouble, yet comfort from Christ is also needed. Martha and Mary had comforters, yet Martha went and met Jesus, when she heard of His coming, to welcome Him as a needed guest.

However, when Martha meets Jesus, she challenges Him with her regrets that He had not come sooner and prevented her brother from dying. This weakness and infirmity broke out of her, and got a headstart of her better side. When we are in straits, we should treat with suspicion the emotions which burst out of us first of all (Psalm 116:11 & 31:22). So though we cannot justify the impassioned outbursts of the saints, yet we ought not to examine them too narrowly or censure them, because they are really only a violent temptation which tramples on grace only temporarily. After her first outburst, Martha settles a little, and corrects it with a profession of her faith that Christ, if He wished, could yet put everything right.

So, alongside her faith, Martha had her own dissatisfaction with how Christ had acted. Yet her faith prevails to the extent that she does not stay away from Him, but goes to Him. Unbelief is never deadly, as long as it does not keep you from coming to Christ. Whatever complaints you may have about Christ’s dealings, yet faith is still the conqueror, as long as you pour out all these complaints into Christ’s own bosom.

Jesus brings comfort gently

“Jesus saith unto her, Thy brother shall rise again” (verse 23). He replies to her meekly. Passing over her infirmity, He comforts her with the promise that her brother would rise again.

Great are the consolations which God has laid up for His afflicted people, and He will do great things for them. It is a satisfactory and proper consolation against the death of these we love, to believe in a resurrection, in which they shall rise again. This is what Christ uses to comfort her.

Christ puts this promise only in general terms, “Thy brother shall rise again,” not mentioning the time when it would be. Even though He was going to raise her brother presently, yet simply the promise of a general resurrection is itself full of comfort (1 Thess. 4:13–14, etc.). We have no reason to stumble when we have no warrant to expect the same particular favour as Martha received, because Christ propounds this comfort in these general terms.

In Martha’s own case, Christ put it this way, partly to exercise her faith, and to let her and us see, in practice, how far short our expectations may be of what Christ will actually do for His people. She looked for the resurrection at the last day, but He was going to raise her brother almost the next minute. Partly also, He let her consolation come in bit by bit into her narrow-mouthed vessel. As the Lord’s people are allowed to believe and expect a mercy even when they cannot resolve every particular detail of how, or when, or by what means it will come to pass, so their hearts are often so shallow that they can take in mercies only in little instalments here and there.

Grief can puzzle faith

When Martha is given this promise and offer of comfort, she seems to take exception against it. Although she confesses that she believes in the resurrection and judgement of the last day, yet she seems to look on it as insufficient for her own encouragement, seeing it is something that refers to everyone, and it is a long way off (verse 24).

Because of our weakness, and our fondness for getting unique satisfaction for our own personal situations, we are ready to slight all the mercies and consolations of God, unless we get exactly what we ourselves regard as a mercy. The general resurrection is not a small comfort, and the resurrection of the just is a far better comfort than to be restored again to the toils of this life, yet Martha undervalues all that, in comparison of getting her brother back again now.

It is however not unusual to see people believing great things that are far off, yet their faith proving weak in the matter of their current trial, even though that is less difficult than what they profess to believe. Martha can believe in the resurrection of all, and of Lazarus among the rest, at the last day, yet at the same time she staggers at the possibility that he may be raised shortly. Yet the one is as difficult as the other, if not indeed more difficult.

What faith needs, faith finds in Jesus

“Jesus said unto her, I am the resurrection, and the life: he that believeth in me, though he were dead, yet shall he live. And whosoever liveth and believeth in me, shall never die” (verses 25–26).

Although Martha believes in the resurrection, yet Christ finds it needful to instruct her better in many things about it. Believers need daily instruction from Christ, so that they will know and understand better those things which they already believe in part. Also, it is not enough that we believe in great benefits and mercies, unless we believe that they are in Christ, and seek them in Him. It is not enough that Martha believes in the resurrection, unless she believes that Christ is the resurrection and the life.

Also, we are to think of Christ, not as merely the instrument of life and resurrection to any, but as the one who principally authors it by His own power. Although many prophets and apostles raised the dead, yet it can be said by none but Christ, “I am the resurrection and the life.”

Those who unite with and enjoy Christ will find in Him, and to hand, all things which they would otherwise seek far off, and possibly not find. Martha looked afar off, to a better day, for the accomplishment of Christ’s promise, but He challenges her to see it in Him, at hand, that He is the resurrection and the life, who can raise up her brother even now.

Believers walk and grow in new life

By regeneration, the children of God are put in a state of life, and this they demonstrate by their subsequent walk – by exercising the functions of spiritual life, and being living in their way. Anyone to whom Christ is “the resurrection,” is someone who lives.

Seeing that spiritual life flows only from Christ embraced by faith, it must be maintained by the same means – faith in Christ. As the dead, by believing, live, so, “he that liveth,” must “believe in me,” Jesus says. Keeping our spiritual life going is a continual resurrection, and as the same power (God’s) is employed in both begetting and maintaining this life, so the same means (faith) must continually be exercised. Clearly, if someone slips up in their walk or becomes spiritually weak, they are taking an exceedingly wrong course of action if they cast away their confidence.

The power of Christ is continually forthcoming to preserve those who believe in Him from utter decay in their spiritual life. Although they may be overtaken with some degrees of death, yet on renewing their faith, they shall be recovered. He will also preserve them from eternal death, and bodily death itself shall not extinguish the life that is begotten and maintained by faith in Jesus Christ.

Jesus encourages detailed faith

Jesus poses Martha the question, “Believest thou this?” (verse 26). We should daily pose the same thing to our own hearts.

In particular, it is necessary both that we are well grounded in the faith of getting life through Christ, and that we make special application to ourselves of the general promise He makes about this. Then we won’t have to scrabble around looking for our faith when Christ calls for it.

In Martha’s answer, she assents to what Christ requires her to believe, and adds a confession of her faith about His person and offices. “She saith unto him, Yea, Lord, I believe that thou art the Christ the Son of God, which should come into the world” (verse 27). Perhaps she felt her faith was too weak to expressly grasp all that He was saying, though she assents to it, and so she deals with all that in a word, and simply professes her faith in Him, acknowledging Him to be the promised Messiah, the Son of God, and consequently, professing that she believes whatever may flow from this fact.

When our faith is weak, it will grow up to more clarity and assurance by conversing with Christ, laying open our weaknesses to Him, and receiving instructions from Him.

Some things (such as the truths about Christ’s person and offices) are fundamentals, and the rest are only the particular application of these general truths to particular cases. So, here, Martha falls back on the fact that “thou art the Christ, etc,” as her chief and all-inclusive ground of comfort.

In fact, the consequences which flow from these fundamental encouragements and promises are so many, and so full, that someone who believes the fundamentals may not even see the consequences very clearly, nor very firmly believe all that flows from them. But we can see from Martha that if you believe the general encouragements, you have much more to be refreshed and comforted with than you have so far realised. In God’s rich love, accommodating to our weakness, He draws out these general promises into particular ones, relating to our particular necessities.

Therefore, when our faith staggers in any particular moment of need, or proves weak in believing a particular promise, we should fall back on these general grounds of faith and encouragement, and hold them tight till we get more, and study the fullness that is in them, so that we may be led on to more particular confidence. That is what Martha did.

Studying Christ’s person and offices is a notable means of confirming our faith in all the promises about all the benefits to be had in Him. Martha lays hold on this, “I believe that thou art the Christ, the Son of God which should come into the world,” for just that reason. Carefully examining who Christ is and what He does, will make us sure both of His good will, as Mediator, and His power, as God, to do what He promises.

READ MORE

LIKE THIS

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter and receive an updated article every week.

Feeding the sheep means loving the sheep

Feeding the sheep means loving the sheep

Feeding the sheep means loving the sheep
George Hutcheson (1615-1674) ministered in Ayrshire and Edinburgh and was a noted bible expositor. Like many other ministers he was removed from his congregation in 1662 for refusing to conform to the rule of bishops.

Pastors are commissioned by the Lord Jesus Christ to care for the spiritual welfare of the flock. Yet pastors are themselves fallen and frail sinners, with many disappointing missteps in their past. When they have themselves slipped up so badly so many times, can Jesus really have any more use for them in His ministry? Looking at the case of Peter, George Hutcheson says that restoration after a terrible fall is difficult, yet certainly possible. In the following updated exposition of John 21, Hutcheson shows how Christ’s prime requirement in His ministers is that they love His flock, the little lambs and older sheep who He loves and wants fed. The love of a restored believer for Christ does not erase the memory of their painful falls, but the memory of what they have been rescued from gives shape and depth to their love for Christ and His people as they move forward in humble service.

In John 21:15–17, on profession of his love to Christ, Peter is restored to and confirmed in his apostolic office which he had forfeited by his foul and gross fall. Christ’s threefold question about Peter’s love is only intended to draw out a threefold answer from Peter, so that his professed repentance would be as frequent as his denial. Consequently, we are not to look on Christ’s threefold injunction to Peter as three distinct commands requiring diverse things, but only as one command three times repeated.

Restoration to ministry is difficult

In general, this teaches that apostacy and denial of Christ, though even out of weakness in a time of strait, is full of hazard. It brings disciples to a loss not easily recovered. Peter, by reason of his fall, needs a kind of restitution, and a confirmation anew in his office and dignity.

At the same time, when Christ puts His people on service, and calls for evidences of their love to him, He first goes before them with proofs of Himself – His power, love and care – in order to engage them to their duty. His enquiry about Peter’s love, and His engaging him to service, was not till after He had given proof of Himself by the miracle, “when they had dined,” and after their bodies were refreshed by Him.

Love is essential in the servants of Christ

Christ’s question to Peter, and the triple way of propounding it, teaches that love to Christ is the Christian’s badge. Anyone who deserts that standard is a runaway. This is what Christ tests Peter by: “Simon, son of Jonas, lovest thou me?”

Ministers who are called to take charge of Christ’s children and flock need much love to Him. No service they may offer can be approved, if instead of flowing from love to Christ, it is undertaken for some hidden agenda. Nor, without this love, is there any possibility of enduring the many blasts they will meet with in their calling, or the much toil they will have, even with and from the flock itself. The inquiry, “Lovest thou me?” is premised as a needful qualification for discharging the trust committed to the minister.

Yet whatever love for Christ people may warrantably claim to have, it does not allow them to swell in their own eyes because of it, or because of any dignity conferred on them as those who love Christ. Saints, in their repenting for their failings, should look back to the low estate from which Christ has raised them, so that they will see all the more clearly their ingratitude, in back-sliding or forsaking Him. That is why He guards all these questions with this designation, “Simon” (not “Peter,” the name He gave him; John 1:42), and “son of Jonas,” a poor fisherman. It is so that Peter, as he professes his repentance and renewed love, will let his heart be affected with thoughts of the low estate from where he was exalted, and to which Christ might justly debase him again, and leave him as He found him, “Simon, son of Jonas.” In professing his love, and embracing this charge, he should still remember his origins.

Our love should not exclude but be enhanced by the memory of what we have done

The sense of the Lord’s people’s backslidings should be a whet-stone to sharpen their love to Christ, and to make them not content to return to a formal way of profession after their foul slips, but to move forward with a new edge on them, to recover their losses, and prevent falling again in a similar way in the future. This is why Christ enquires particularly at Peter, “Lovest thou me?” because if he has been truly recovered, he ought to be eminent in love, and have it more deeply rooted in his heart, partly so that he will not slide again, and partly in testimony of his sense of Christ’s kindness, who looked on him after his fall.

True repentance should, and will, not only be sincere and real, but just as eminent in its effects as the sinner’s fall was. Peter’s threefold profession of love to Christ corresponds to his threefold denial of Christ.

Those who have fallen grossly in the time of temptation, and have through mercy been recovered again, should still be suspicious of themselves, as having grossly given the lie to their former professions. Christ wants for Peter not to easily trust himself, considering what big claims he had made before, when he gone and fallen so badly.

Christ initially puts the question in comparative terms. “Lovest thou me more than these?” That is, “more than any of the rest love me?” He is not so much saying that someone who has fallen and been restored should strive to out-strip the next one in the grace of love. Rather He wants Peter to reflect on his former conceit of himself, and his unique undertaking (Matt. 26:33), and maybe also his recent forwardness in coming out of the ship (John 21:7) and testing whether, because of that, he would boast of any unique love to Him. And so, with the offer of accepting his sincere love, and calling for it, He rips up Peter’s former conceit of himself.

This teaches us, partly, that the evil of a saint’s apostasies and defections will never be thoroughly cured by any returning out of one particular evil course, unless the fountain, cause and root of their evils is cured, and continually abhorred and watched over. Christ presents Peter with what had occasioned his former fall, to see what he thinks of it, and if it continued with him. Partly too it teaches us that Christ allows His people to season their bitter thoughts of their own evils with the offer of His love and acceptance of what is good and sincere in them. He propounds this indirect challenge in such a way that He also guards it with an offer of His present acceptance of Peter’s love.

Peter modestly declines in his answer to make any comparisons. So in the second and third questions, Christ omits the comparison, and puts the question simply, “Lovest thou me?” He covers and passes by infirmities when He sees us convinced of them.

The connection between restoration, humility and love

We need not curiously distinguish between the different Greek words that Peter uses in his answers to Christ’s questions, signifying greater and lesser degrees of love. If any distinction should be made between these expressions, the fact that Christ uses both shows us that He takes notice of, and is willing to accept of, lesser degrees of sincere love as well as greater. He interrogates concerning both, implying (a) that He will accept either, and also (b) that those who are sober and dare not profess an eminent measure of love to Christ still need to examine if they are sincere and real even in the weaker degree they profess.

Whatever the exact signification of these words, yet there are several things we may learn from Peter’s answers.

  1. It is very possible for fallen saints to recover their feet, and attain to love again.
  2. Someone who truly loves Christ may humbly avow his love before Him as often as He enquires about it. “Yea, Lord, I love thee.”
  3. If we sincerely love Christ, our falls will teach us sobriety, and not to boast of ourselves above others. Peter makes no comparisons in answer to Christ’s first question, but simply ranks himself among those who do love Him.
  4. Those who want to prove themselves to truly love Christ must not only satisfy themselves in the matter, but should appeal to His knowledge, and be sure that He knows and approves of them as such. “Lord, thou knowest that I love thee.”
  5. Those who want to approve themselves to Christ should think of Him as knowing all things, and remember that therefore He will not be deceived with performances. “Thou knowest all things, thou knowest that I love thee.”
  6. Our sight of the grace of God in us, after our back-slidings, should be joined with the sense of our falling. When Peter was grieved, Christ puts him in mind of how his former sliding had justly rendered him suspect, so that the awareness of this would accompany his profession of love.

Service includes the memory of what we have done

Christ commissions Peter, repeating it three times. Christ is able to make good use of saints who fell foully in a time of temptation, and can raise them up again, to do Him eminent service in their generation. Fallen Peter is again entrusted with the charge of Christ’s sheep and lambs.

The moment a saint loves Christ, Christ extends that love to all His people, so that anyone who truly loves Him will show kindness to them. As soon as Peter professes love to Christ, He directs him, “Feed my lambs.” A great evidence of reality of love to Christ is to have a care of Christ’s lambs.

Ministers ought to think of Christ’s people as very seriously recommended to them, and therefore they should very seriously mind their work for them. The threefold charge signalled this for Peter.

Those who want to be faithful in a ministerial charge ought to look on the people of their charge as really Christ’s people, and people who Christ is in a close relationship with. Christ calls them “My lambs, my sheep.” These people are loved by Christ, committed to the minister’s charge by Christ, and Christ wants the minister to win them to Christ.

Ministers ought to keep in mind the variety of personalities, and degrees of strength, which are in the people committed to their charge, so they may interact with them and care for them accordingly. There are both weaker lambs, and stronger sheep. Remember Isaiah 40:10–11, “Behold, the Lord God will come with strong hand …. he shall feed his flock like a shepherd: he shall gather the lambs with his arm, and carry them in his bosom, and shall gently lead those that are with young.”

Feeding is a major part of the minister’s work. Ministers are to feed Christ’s people with sound and wholesome doctrine, and to dispense it in such a way that reaches the capacity of the weakest. Christ’s first command is to give food, and specifically to the lambs.

Yet it is not sufficient that ministers be able to feed the people in their charge unless they also govern and rule them, and do every other duty of a good shepherd unto them. And even the strongest ought to subject themselves to this government. In Christ’s second repetition of the charge the word is different from the previous one, “Feed, or govern, and play the shepherd, and that even for the sheep.”

Not even the strongest believers will ever come to a time when they have reached such a height of perfection and sanctity that they have out-grown Christ’s ordinances, which include the ministry. Ministers are obliged to deal with them accordingly. In the third repetition of the charge, Christ goes back to the word He first used, “Feed, or provide food,” and that even to “my sheep,” as well as to lambs.

 

READ MORE

LIKE THIS

Subscribe to our weekly newsletter and receive an updated article every week.